Litigation & Arbitration
Commercial Arbitration in Nigeria: Why More Businesses Are Choosing It Over Court
Oma Lynda Ekwem · OAA Law · 20 June 2026 · 6 min read

Ask any Nigerian business owner who has been through a contested commercial suit what it cost them, and the answer will rarely start with legal fees. It starts with time — adjournments, transfers, appeals on interlocutory applications, and the slow erosion of a commercial relationship that might otherwise have been salvaged.
That experience is why arbitration has moved from a clause people skimmed past to a decision boards now take deliberately. At OAA Law we are asked about it constantly, usually in one of two moments: when a contract is being drafted, or when a dispute has already started and someone is checking whether the contract left them an exit from the court list.
What arbitration actually offers
Speed. A well-run arbitration is measured in months rather than years. The tribunal is appointed for your matter alone, sits when the parties and tribunal are available, and is not competing with a crowded cause list.
Confidentiality. Court proceedings are public. Arbitration is private, which matters enormously where the dispute involves pricing, trade secrets, sensitive counterparties, or reputational exposure a listed group would rather not explain.
Expertise. Parties choose the tribunal. In a construction, energy or shareholder dispute, an arbitrator who understands the sector will grasp in an afternoon what would take weeks of expert evidence to establish elsewhere.
Finality. An arbitral award is binding, with narrow grounds for challenge. That closes the appellate corridor that keeps so many Nigerian commercial disputes alive long after commercial interest in them has died.
Enforceability across borders. Nigeria is a party to the New York Convention, so an award made here is enforceable in a large number of foreign jurisdictions — a significant advantage where a counterparty holds assets outside the country.
What makes an arbitration clause work
Most of the arbitration problems our law firm sees were created years earlier, at drafting stage, by a clause copied from an unrelated agreement. A workable clause answers five questions without ambiguity.
- Scope — does it cover all disputes "arising out of or in connection with" the agreement, or only a narrow slice?
- Seat — the legal seat determines the supervising court and the procedural law. Lagos is a common and sensible choice for Nigerian commercial contracts.
- Rules and institution — ad hoc, or administered under institutional rules? Institutional administration costs more and saves more.
- Number and method of appointment of arbitrators — one arbitrator for smaller matters, three where the sums justify it, with a fallback appointing authority so a reluctant party cannot stall.
- Language and governing law — stated expressly rather than assumed.
A dispute-resolution clause is the only clause in a contract that is read exclusively when things have already gone wrong. It should be drafted in that spirit.
OAA Law treats the dispute-resolution clause as a commercial term, not boilerplate, and we negotiate it with the same attention we give price and delivery.
When litigation is still the right forum
Arbitration is not a universal answer, and it is a disservice to pretend otherwise.
Where a party needs urgent, enforceable interim relief against a third party, the courts remain more effective. Where the claim is a straightforward undefended debt, the court's summary procedures are faster and far cheaper than constituting a tribunal. Where the counterparty has no assets and no intention of participating, an award is simply an expensive precursor to enforcement proceedings you could have started directly. And where a matter turns on public law, regulatory power, criminal conduct or title to land, arbitration may not be available at all.
Our law firm advises on the forum before advising on the fight. Choosing wrongly is expensive in a way that no amount of good advocacy later can recover.
Mediation: the step most parties skip
Between negotiation and arbitration sits mediation, and it resolves a surprising proportion of commercial disputes in a single day. Because mediation is non-binding until settlement is signed, parties can test positions without conceding them. Where a continuing business relationship has value — a distributor, a landlord, a joint venture partner — mediation preserves what litigation usually destroys.
How OAA Law runs arbitration and ADR matters
Our arbitration and dispute practice is led by the Principal Partner, a Member of the Nigerian Institute of Chartered Arbitrators (MCArb) and an Associate of the Institute of Chartered Mediators and Conciliators, with more than two decades of contentious and commercial experience across litigation chambers and in-house energy sector roles.
That combination shapes how we run matters. We assess the commercial outcome first — payment, performance, release or exit — and select the process that reaches it fastest. We draft and negotiate arbitration clauses at contract stage so the option exists when it is needed. We represent clients through appointment, pleadings, evidence and hearing, and we pursue or resist enforcement of awards where required. Throughout, OAA Law continues to test settlement, because an award you never have to enforce is usually the best result available.
If your business is negotiating a significant contract, or is already in a dispute and unsure whether arbitration is open to you, speak to our law firm. A short consultation at the right moment routinely saves years at the wrong one.
Speak with OAA Law about your matter.
Consultations are handled directly by the Principal Partner.



